Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KAMSTRUP, O.
Right arrow Articles by DAVIS, J. M. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KAMSTRUP, O.
Right arrow Articles by DAVIS, J. M. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 135-142, 2002
© 2002 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press


Article

Carcinogenicity Studies after Intraperitoneal Injection of Two Types of Stone Wool Fibres in Rats

O. KAMSTRUP1,*, A. ELLEHAUGE1, C. G. COLLIER2 and J. M. G. DAVIS3

1Rockwool International A/S, Hovedgaden 584, DK-2640 Hedehusene, Denmark; 2AEA Technology, Harwell, UK; 3Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, UK

Received 17 August 2001; in final form 1 November 2001.

A summary is given of the pathology results after intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection in rats of insulation wool HT, representing the new biosoluble types. The pathology results are compared with a previously conducted i.p. study with traditional stone wool D6 (with similar chemical composition to MMVF21). The HT fibre is characterized by a relatively high content of aluminium and a relatively low content of silica compared to MMVF21. HT has a high in vitro dissolution rate at pH 4.5, a relatively low dissolution rate at pH 7.5 and is less biopersistent than the MMVF21 fibre. Female Wistar rats received a dose of 2 x 109 WHO HT fibres by i.p. injection. The fibres had been size-selected to be largely rat respirable. The negative control group was exposed to saline. Following exposure, the animals were maintained until survival in one group fell below 20%. At this time, all animals were killed. All animals were subjected to a necropsy examination; any gross abnormalities observed at necropsy were subjected to histopathological examination. In addition, histopathology was carried out on a predefined list of tissues. The incidences of lesions and survival in the control and fibre dosed animals were compared using appropriate statistical methods to determine whether the dosed animals showed adverse effects on survival or a positive carcinogenic response. The main protocol for the previously conducted study with D6 (MMVF21) was similar, but the animals were maintained as long as they survived, and the WHO fibre dose was lower. The results of the comparative study showed a marked difference in the i.p. pathogenicity of D6 (MMVF21) and HT in terms of their carcinogenic potential. D6 (MMVF21) caused a statistically significant increase of mesotheliomas in the peritoneal cavity compared to the negative control, but the HT fibre did not cause any mesotheliomas or any increase in other tumour types.

Keywords: man-made vitreous fibres; HT stone wool; intraperitoneal injection; pathogenicity; rat


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
J. Muller, M. Delos, N. Panin, V. Rabolli, F. Huaux, and D. Lison
Absence of Carcinogenic Response to Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes in a 2-Year Bioassay in the Peritoneal Cavity of the Rat
Toxicol. Sci., August 1, 2009; 110(2): 442 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
O. KAMSTRUP, A. ELLEHAUGE, B. BELLMANN, J. CHEVALIER, and J. M. G. DAVIS
Subchronic Inhalation Study of Stone Wool Fibres in Rats
Ann. Hyg., March 1, 2004; 48(2): 91 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.