Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DURAND, K. T. H.
Right arrow Articles by SEIXAS, N. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DURAND, K. T. H.
Right arrow Articles by SEIXAS, N. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 113-118, 2002
© 2002 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press


Article

Effect of Sampling Time on the Culturability of Airborne Fungi and Bacteria Sampled by Filtration

KATE T. H. DURAND1, MICHAEL L. MUILENBERG2, HARRIET A. BURGE2 and NOAH S. SEIXAS1,*

1University of Washington, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Department of Environmental Health; 2Harvard University, School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health

Received 6 October 2000; in final form 20 March 2001.

Air sampling of bioaerosols by filtration may be preferable for many epidemiological studies because the methods can be used to collect personal samples for a full work-shift. There is some concern, however, that the viability of fungal spores and bacterial cells might be compromised by sampling for as long as a full shift. This study was designed to determine the effect of sampling up to 6 h on the viability (measured by culture) of airborne fungi and bacteria at composting facilities. Six side-by-side samples were collected in two locations at each of three composting facilities for 1 h at 2 l/m on polycarbonate filters. Two samples in each set were then capped while clean, HEPA-filtered air was drawn across two others for an additional 2 h and across the last two for an additional 5 h. Filters were washed and the samples were analyzed for culturable bacteria and fungi, and for total bacteria and fungi by microscopic counting. Concentrations ranged from 1.7 x 103to 6.2 x 107 c.f.u./m3 of culturable fungi and 1.17 x 104 to 1.0 x 106 c.f.u./m3 of culturable bacteria. In linear models that included duration of sampling, location, and the interaction of location and sample duration, neither sample duration nor the interaction term were significant predictors of the logs of the concentrations of culturable fungi or bacteria or of the ratio of the logs of the culturable concentrations to total concentrations for fungi or bacteria. This suggests that increased sampling time does not affect the viability of the organisms commonly found in the air at composting facilities.

Keywords: bioaerosols; sampling methods; composting; organic dusts; microbial viability; filter sampling


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
K. Fallschissel, P. Kampfer, and U. Jackel
Direct Detection of Salmonella Cells in the Air of Livestock Stables by Real-Time PCR
Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2009; 53(8): 859 - 868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
A. M. Madsen and A. K. Sharma
Sampling of High Amounts of Bioaerosols Using a High-Volume Electrostatic Field Sampler
Ann. Hyg., April 1, 2008; 52(3): 167 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.