Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 45, No. 90001, pp. S5-S17, 2001
© 2001 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press
Could pesticide toxicology studies be more relevant to occupational risk assessment?
Infoscientific.com, Inc., Carmichael, CAUSA Infoscientific.com, Inc., Manassas, VAUSA Cal/EPA Department of Pesticide Regulation, Sacramento, CAUSA University of California at Riverside, CA, USA
Tel.: +1-916-486-6100; Fax: +1-916-486-6181
Received 17 August, 2000; Accepted 30 November, 2000.
Pesticide toxicology study design has evolved from concern for oral exposure via food residues. The emphasis on the oral route does not generally apply to workers that are exposed primarily via the dermal route either handling pesticides or re-entering treated fields. As a result numerous assumptions about how oral toxicology results relate to dermal exposure must be made when conducting worker risk assessments. These assumptions introduce a high degree of uncertainty. Alternative toxicology study designs are suggested to reduce uncertainty when assessing risk. Because the dermal route is so important to characterizing occupational risk, methods to improve the accuracy of dermal absorption estimates are suggested, including the use of human subjects to study dermal absorption. Additional suggestions include tailoring dermal, oral and inhalation kinetic study designs to reflect worker exposure dosages. Suggestions are made to routinely conduct a single dose toxicity study patterned after the neurotoxicity study design to distinguish single dose effects and NOAELs from those resulting from multiple doses. Finally, interspecies pharmacokinetics studies are proposed to determine which toxicology study regimen of dosing best reflects intermittent worker exposure.
pesticide; toxicology; occupational; risk; pharmacokinetics