Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garrod, A. N. I.
Right arrow Articles by Rimmer, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Garrod, A. N. I.
Right arrow Articles by Rimmer, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 421-426, 2000
© 2000 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press

Potential Exposure of Amateurs (Consumers) through Painting Wood Preservative and Antifoulant Preparations

A. N. I. Garrod{dagger},*, R. Guiver{ddagger} and D. A. Rimmer{ddagger}

{dagger} HSE, Magdalen House, Stanley Precinct Bootle L20 3QZ, UK
{ddagger} HSL, Robens Building, Broad Lane Sheffield S3 7HQ, UK

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: +44-151-951-4080; Fax: +44-151-951-3317; E-mail: andrew.garrod{at}hse.gov.uk

Data are presented for work patterns, inhalation and potential dermal exposure for amateurs painting wood preservatives to garden structures, and antifoulants to leisure boats. The results are quoted as rates of in-use product deposition or time-weighted inhaled product concentrations. Quoting data in this general and normalized form enables predictive risk assessment. The product densities were assumed to be 1.0 g ml–1. Inhalation exposure was detected in about 40% of the surveys, being about 100 times higher for wood preservatives than for antifoulants. The maximum airborne wood preservative concentration was 8.03 mg m–3, measured over the period of painting (that is not an 8 h time-weighted average value). Regarding potential dermal exposure, the processes are only broadly comparable. Most of the data appear to fall into relatively narrow distributions, with median values around 5 mg min–1 (for preservatives) and around 16 mg min–1 (for antifoulants). About half of the deposit on clothing was found to occur below the waist. The data comparing gloved and bare hand working indicate that even simple gloves offer a degree of protection for skin. Crown Copyright © 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd on behalf of British Occupational Hygiene Society. All rights reserved.

wood preservatives • antifoulants • pesticides • painting • dermal exposure • consumers • amateurs

Received July 14, 1999; in final form November 16, 1999


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
I. LINKS, K. E. V. D. JAGT, Y. CHRISTOPHER, M. LURVINK, J. SCHINKEL, E. TIELEMANS, and J. J. V. HEMMEN
Occupational Exposure During Application and Removal of Antifouling Paints
Ann. Hyg., March 1, 2007; 51(2): 207 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
N. D. WARREN, H. MARQUART, Y. CHRISTOPHER, J. LAITINEN, and J. J. VAN HEMMEN
Task-based Dermal Exposure Models for Regulatory Risk Assessment
Ann. Hyg., July 1, 2006; 50(5): 491 - 503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
P. D. JOHNSON, D. A. RIMMER, A. N. I. GARROD, J. E. HELPS, and C. MAWDSLEY
Operator Exposure When Applying Amenity Herbicides by All-Terrain Vehicles and Controlled Droplet Applicators
Ann. Hyg., January 1, 2005; 49(1): 25 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
J. WHITE
Determination of Triglycidyl Isocyanurate from Powder Coatings in Occupational Hygiene Samples by Gas Chromatography with Mass Spectrometric Detection
Ann. Hyg., August 1, 2004; 48(6): 555 - 563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
J Brisman, M J Nieuwenhuijsen, K M Venables, V Putcha, S Gordon, and A J N Taylor
Exposure-response relations for work related respiratory symptoms and sensitisation in a cohort exposed to {alpha}-amylase
Occup. Environ. Med., June 1, 2004; 61(6): 551 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
P. DELGADO, J. PORCEL, I. ABRIL, N. TORRES, A. TERAN, and A. ZUGASTI
Potential Dermal Exposure during the Painting Process in Car Body Repair Shops
Ann. Hyg., April 1, 2004; 48(3): 229 - 236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
N. WARREN, H. A. GOEDE, S. C. H. A. TIJSSEN, R. OPPL, H. J. SCHIPPER, and J. J. VAN HEMMEN
Deriving Default Dermal Exposure Values for Use in a Risk Assessment Toolkit for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises
Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2003; 47(8): 619 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
B. VAN-WENDEL-DE-JOODE, D. H. BROUWER, R. VERMEULEN, J. J. VAN HEMMEN, D. HEEDERIK, and H. KROMHOUT
DREAM: A Method for Semi-quantitative Dermal Exposure Assessment
Ann. Hyg., January 1, 2003; 47(1): 71 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
J. Brisman
Baker's asthma
Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2002; 59(7): 498 - 502.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
J. P. WHEELER and N. D. WARREN
A Dirichlet Tessellation-based Sampling Scheme for Measuring Whole-body Exposure
Ann. Hyg., March 1, 2002; 46(2): 209 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.