Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dost, A.A.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dost, A.A.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 329-342, 2000
© 2000 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press

Exposure to rubber fume and rubber process dust in the general rubber goods, tyre manufacturing and retread industries

A.A. Dost, D. Redman and G. Cox

Health and Safety Executive, Woodside House, 261 Low Lane, Horsforth, Leeds LS18 5TW, UK Health and Safety Executive, Sovereign House, 110 Queen Street, Sheffield S1 2ES, UK

Tel: +44 (0)113 283-4200; fax: +44 (0)113 283-4344

Received 24 June, 1999; Revised 10 November, 1999.

This study assesses the current patterns and levels of exposure to rubber fume and rubber process dust in the British rubber industry and compares and contrasts the data obtained from the general rubber goods (GRG), retread tyre (RT) and new tyre (NT) sectors. A total of 179 rubber companies were visited and data were obtained from 52 general rubber goods, 29 retread tyre and 7 new tyre manufacturers. The survey was conducted using a questionnaire and included a walk-through inspection of the workplace to assess the extent of use of control measures and the nature of work practices being employed. The most recent (predominantly 1995–97) exposure monitoring data for rubber fume and rubber process dust were obtained from these companies; no additional sampling was conducted for the purpose of this study. In addition to the assessment of exposure data, evaluation of occupational hygiene reports for the quality of information and advice was also carried out.

A comparison of the median exposures for processes showed that the order of exposure to rubber fume (E, in mg m-3) is: Emoulding (0.40){approx}Eextrusion (0.33)>Emilling (0.18) for GRG; Epress (0.32)>Eextrusion (0.19)>Eautoclave (0.10) for RT; and Epress (0.22){approx}Eall other (0.22) for NT. The order of exposure to rubber fume between sectors was EGRG (0.40)>ERT (0.32)>ENT (0.22). Median exposures to rubber process dust in the GRG was Eweighing (4.2)>>Emixing (1.2){approx}Emilling (0.8){approx}Eextrusion (0.8) and no significant difference (P=0.31) between GRG and NT sectors. The findings compare well with the study carried out in the Netherlands [Kromhout et al. (1994), Annals of Occupational Hygiene 38(1), 3–22], and it is suggested that the factors governing the significant differences noted between the three sectors relate principally to the production and task functions and also to the extent of controls employed.

Evaluation of occupational hygiene reports indicated a number of shortcomings including lack of suitable and sufficient information with regard to sampling and analytical methods in use, poor sampling strategy, lack of appreciation regarding true rubber process dust, and a poor understanding of the principles of control for substances assigned maximum exposure limits.

rubber fume; rubber process dust; occupational hygiene reports; rubber industry


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
F de Vocht, R Vermeulen, I Burstyn, W Sobala, A Dost, D Taeger, U Bergendorf, K Straif, P Swuste, H Kromhout, et al.
Exposure to inhalable dust and its cyclohexane soluble fraction since the 1970s in the rubber manufacturing industry in the European Union
Occup. Environ. Med., June 1, 2008; 65(6): 384 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Occup Med (Lond)Home page
A. Dost, J. Straughan, and T. Sorahan
A cohort mortality and cancer incidence survey of recent entrants (1982-91) to the UK rubber industry: findings for 1983-2004
Occup. Med., May 1, 2007; 57(3): 186 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
B. LAFFON, J. P. TEIXEIRA, S. SILVA, J. ROMA-TORRES, B. PEREZ-CADAHIA, J. MENDEZ, E. PASARO, and O. MAYAN
Assessment of Occupational Genotoxic Risk in the Production of Rubber Tyres
Ann. Hyg., August 1, 2006; 50(6): 583 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
F. DE VOCHT, K. STRAIF, N. SZESZENIA-DABROWSKA, L. HAGMAR, T. SORAHAN, I. BURSTYN, R. VERMEULEN, and H. KROMHOUT
A Database of Exposures in the Rubber Manufacturing Industry: Design and Quality Control
Ann. Hyg., November 1, 2005; 49(8): 691 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.