Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BURGE, S.
Right arrow Articles by ROBERTSON, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BURGE, S.
Right arrow Articles by ROBERTSON, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Ann. occup. Hyg., Vol. 31, No. 4A, pp. 493-504, 1987
© 1987 British Occupational Hygiene Society
Published by Oxford University Press


research-article

SICK BUILDING SYNDROME: A STUDY OF 4373 OFFICE WORKERS

SHERWOOD BURGE*, ALAN HEDGE{dagger},{ddagger}, SHEENA WILSON§, JON HARRIS BASS|| and ALASTAIR ROBERTSON*

*Occupational Lung Disease Unit, East Birmingham Hospital Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, B9 5ST, U.K.
{dagger}Applied Psychology Group, Aston University Birmingham. U.K.
§Building Use Studies Limited London, U.K.
||RMJM Limited, Architects and Engineers London. U.K.

Symptoms of building sickness were studied among 4373 office workers in 42 different office buildings and 47 different ventilation conditions. The overall response rate was 92%. Assessments of buildings were also made. Work-related symptoms were common in all work groups. The mean number per worker (maximum 10) was significantly greater in women than in men (3.66 vs 2.75) and independently greater in clerical or secretarial workers (3.65) than technical or professional workers (2.85) who in turn reported more symptoms than managers (2.50). Overall, buildings with ventilation from local or central induction/fan coil units had more work-related symptoms per worker than buildings with ‘all air’ systems, which in turn had more than naturally or mechanically ventilated buildings. There was, however, wide variation between the building sickness indices of buildings within each ventilation category which was only partially explained by differences in jobs and gender of their workforces. Symptoms increased substantially once the air supply was chilled or humidified. Microbiological contamination of the supply air from chillers as well as humidifiers may account for some of the symptoms found. The commonest work-related symptom was lethargy (57%) closely followed by blocked nose (47%), dry throat (46%) and headache (46%). The least common symptoms were chest tightness and difficulty in breathing (9%); however, the symptoms were more than twice as frequent in buildings with local and centrally supplied induction/fan coil units compared with the naturally ventilated buildings. This study shows that the symptoms of building sickness are widespread and are not related to a few problem buildings, and that design characteristics of the building and its plant are associated with substantial differences in the reported frequencies of symptoms in those working within them.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol Ind HealthHome page
K. H Kilburn
Neurobehavioral and pulmonary impairment in 105 adults with indoor exposure to molds compared to 100 exposed to chemicals
Toxicology and Industrial Health, October 1, 2009; 25(9-10): 681 - 692.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
P. M. Bluyssen
Management of the Indoor Environment: from a Component Related to an Interactive Top-down Approach
Indoor and Built Environment, December 1, 2008; 17(6): 483 - 495.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Environment and BehaviorHome page
M. Rashid and C. Zimring
A Review of the Empirical Literature on the Relationships Between Indoor Environment and Stress in Health Care and Office Settings: Problems and Prospects of Sharing Evidence
Environment and Behavior, March 1, 2008; 40(2): 151 - 190.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
V. Butala and S. Muhic
Perception of Air Quality and the Thermal Environment in Offices
Indoor and Built Environment, August 1, 2007; 16(4): 302 - 310.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
A F Marmot, J Eley, M Stafford, S A Stansfeld, E Warwick, and M G Marmot
Building health: an epidemiological study of "sick building syndrome" in the Whitehall II study.
Occup. Environ. Med., April 1, 2006; 63(4): 283 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
M Lahtinen, C Sundman-Digert, and K Reijula
Psychosocial work environment and indoor air problems: a questionnaire as a means of problem diagnosis
Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2004; 61(2): 143 - 149.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
P S Burge
Sick building syndrome
Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2004; 61(2): 185 - 190.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
K Reijula and C Sundman-Digert
Assessment of indoor air problems at work with a questionnaire
Occup. Environ. Med., January 1, 2004; 61(1): 33 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
M. J. Mendell, W. J. Fisk, K. Kreiss, H. Levin, D. Alexander, W. S. Cain, J. R. Girman, C. J. Hines, P. A. Jensen, D. K. Milton, et al.
Improving the Health of Workers in Indoor Environments: Priority Research Needs for a National Occupational Research Agenda
Am J Public Health, September 1, 2002; 92(9): 1430 - 1440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
D. Norback, G. Wieslander, K. Nordstrom, R. Walinder, and P. Venge
The Effect of Air Humidification on Symptoms and Nasal Patency, Tear Film Stability, and Biomarkers in Nasal Lavage: A 6 Weeks' Longitudinal Study
Indoor and Built Environment, January 1, 2000; 9(1): 28 - 34.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. Menzies and J. Bourbeau
Building-Related Illnesses
N. Engl. J. Med., November 20, 1997; 337(21): 1524 - 1531.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
K. B. Teeuw, C. M. J. E. Vandenbroucke-Grauls, and J. Verhoef
Airborne Gram-negative Bacteria and Endotoxin in Sick Building Syndrome: A Study in Dutch Governmental Office Buildings
Arch Intern Med, October 24, 1994; 154(20): 2339 - 2345.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Asia Pac J Public HealthHome page
P.-L. Ooi, K.-T. Goh, B.-H. Heng, and Y.-H. Toh
Epidemiological Investigations into an Outbreak of Building-Associated Illness in Singapore
Asia Pac J Public Health, October 1, 1994; 7(4): 201 - 205.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
A. Thorn
Case Report on a Sick Building: Analysis and Interpretation in the Context of Its Disease History
Scand J Public Health, September 1, 1994; 22(3): 228 - 234.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
F. J. C. Roe
Priorities for Research in the Field of Indoor Air Pollution
Indoor and Built Environment, July 1, 1994; 3(4): 191 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
R. Rylander, V. Hsieh, and C. Courteheuse
The First Case of Sick Building Syndrome in Switzerland
Indoor and Built Environment, May 1, 1994; 3(3): 159 - 162.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. A. Edelman, T. Hethmon, J. F. Boatman, J. F. McCarthy, J. E. Farnham, G. W. Small, J. S. Bromberg, R. Menzies, and R. Tamblyn
Sick Building Syndrome
N. Engl. J. Med., August 12, 1993; 329(7): 503 - 504.
[Full Text]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
M. Rolloos
HVAC Systems and Indoor Air Quality
Indoor and Built Environment, July 1, 1993; 2(4): 204 - 212.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. Menzies, R. Tamblyn, J.-P. Farant, J. Hanley, F. Nunes, and R. Tamblyn
The Effect of Varying Levels of Outdoor-Air Supply on the Symptoms of Sick Building Syndrome
N. Engl. J. Med., March 25, 1993; 328(12): 821 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
K. Kreiss
The Sick Building Syndrome in Office Buildings -- A Breath of Fresh Air
N. Engl. J. Med., March 25, 1993; 328(12): 877 - 878.
[Full Text]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
R. L. Hanson, B. Dolphin, and D. K. Parkinson
Does Contamination of 'Fresh' Air Intake Cause Some Cases of Building Intolerance?
Indoor and Built Environment, January 1, 1993; 2(1): 19 - 25.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
P. M. Bluyssen
Review : Indoor Air Qualit Management: A State of the Art Review and Identification of Research Needs
Indoor and Built Environment, November 1, 1992; 1(6): 326 - 334.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
R. Rylander, K. Persson, H. Goto, K. Yuasa, and S. Tanaka
Airborne Beta-1,3-Glucan May Be Related to Symptoms in Sick Buildings
Indoor and Built Environment, September 1, 1992; 1(5): 263 - 267.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
I. Gibert, A. Chevalier, and J. Lambrozo
No Difference in Rates of Absenteeism between Workers in Air-Conditioned Offices and Naturally Ventilated Ones: A Data Base Study
Indoor and Built Environment, September 1, 1992; 1(5): 279 - 284.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
K. A. Kuehn, R. Garrison, L. Robertson, R. D. Koehn, A. L. Johnson, and W. J. Rea
Identification of Airborne Microfungal Populations from Home Environments within the Dallas-Fort Worth (Texas) Region
Indoor and Built Environment, September 1, 1992; 1(5): 285 - 292.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
P. Sherwood Burge
Review : The Sick Building Syndrome: Where Are We in 1992?
Indoor and Built Environment, July 1, 1992; 1(4): 199 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.